An emerald cut engagement ring holds a step cut: a rectangle with clipped corners and long, straight facets laid in rows, which flash in broad planes as the hand moves instead of sparkling, the effect the trade calls the hall of mirrors. It is the shape that shows what it holds, so it asks for a cleaner and a whiter stone than a brilliant does, and in lab-grown that costs almost nothing: on October 5, 2026 a 2 carat emerald cut in our picker was $1,183 at VS2 and $1,259 at VVS1. Three decisions matter. Clarity, which you judge from the video rather than the letter. The length-to-width ratio, 1.30 to 1.50 for nearly nine of every ten emerald cuts we sell. And the setting, which on this shape means a bezel more often than on any other, because the bezel emerald cut is the ring our customers find us for most. Clairamor makes 39 emerald cut settings, from the $950 solitaire and bezel to the $2,400 vintage inspired band, and that day a lab-grown emerald cut of D to G color and IF to VS2 clarity started at $640 for 1 carat, $1,183 for 2 and $1,513 for 3, the least expensive shape in our picker at 3 carats. This guide covers all of it, with the numbers from our own inventory.



Emerald cut engagement rings at a glance
| The stone | A step cut: a cut-cornered rectangle with long, parallel facets in rows, usually 57 of them, around a wide open table; the report reads Emerald Cut |
| Light | Broad, slow flashes, light and dark planes sliding across each other; no glitter, no bow-tie; quiet in dim light, striking in daylight |
| Clarity | The grade that matters most: the open table hides nothing. VVS2 or better is the safe choice, VS1 if its video is clean; a 2 carat VVS1 cost $76 more than a VS2 in our picker |
| Color | Shows a trace more warmth than a brilliant: G reads white in gold at any size and in white metal up to about 2 carats, D to F in white metal above that |
| Length-to-width ratio | 1.30 to 1.50 is the classic range and where 2,754 of the 3,166 emerald cuts between 1 and 3 carats in our picker sat; 427 were 1.50 or longer and only three were shorter than 1.30 |
| Size at 2 carats | About 8.3 by 5.9 mm, against 8.2 mm across for a round, 9.1 by 6.3 for a radiant and 10.3 by 7.1 for an oval; about a tenth less face than the round, and more length |
| Durability | No points to chip; the long girdle edges are the exposed part, which is one reason the bezel suits this shape so well |
| Prongs | Four, one at each clipped corner, on our solitaire and cathedral heads; a bezel or half bezel follows the eight-sided outline on the designs most people choose |
| Lab-grown price, our picker | $640 at 1 ct, $793 at 1.5, $1,183 at 2, $1,512 at 2.5, $1,513 at 3, $2,082 at 4, $2,376 at 5, on October 5, 2026 |
| Clairamor settings | 39 emerald cut designs in nine metals, $950 to $2,400 in 14k gold, the setting without the stone |
What an emerald cut diamond is
An emerald cut is a step cut on a clipped-corner rectangle. Where a round brilliant breaks light into fifty-eight small triangles and kites, the emerald cut carries long, straight facets that run parallel to its edges in rows, three on the crown and three on the pavilion around a wide, flat table, usually 57 facets in all, and GIA's description is the plainest, "a rectangular shape with beveled corners and concentric rows of facets" on crown and pavilion alike. Because the facets are long and parallel they do not scatter light; they reflect it in sheets, so the stone flashes in broad planes as it moves, light and dark sliding across each other, which is the hall of mirrors. The cut was developed for emeralds, whose brittle corners needed clipping and whose color showed best through broad facets, and it kept the name when diamond cutters adopted it; it became a signature of the Art Deco years and has not gone out of fashion since. IGI prints the name on the report, Emerald Cut, where a radiant gets a description; our certification guide walks through a report line by line.
The open table is the emerald cut's character and its demand. Look into it and you look into the stone, which is why a clean emerald cut has a transparency no brilliant can match and why an inclusion under that table has nowhere to hide. It is also why the emerald cut is the shape that divides people: those who love it describe it as calm, architectural, elegant, and what they mean is that it does not glitter; those who want sparkle should read our radiant vs emerald cut guide, which puts the two clipped-corner rectangles head to head, or our guide to elongated shapes, which sets the emerald beside the oval, radiant, marquise and moval. This guide is about the emerald cut alone.
Clarity: the grade that matters most in an emerald cut
In a brilliant, clarity is the grade you can save money on; in an emerald cut it is the grade you cannot. A brilliant's facets fragment an inclusion and bury the pieces in sparkle, so a VS2 round or radiant is almost always clean to the naked eye. An emerald cut's facets are windows: a VS2 inclusion that sits under the table can be visible from arm's length, and a dark, central VS1 can be too. GIA's advice for the cut is VS2 clarity and G color or better, with higher grades for stones of 2 to 3 carats and up; ours is a notch stricter, because we have watched the videos. Buy VVS2 or better unless you have watched the VS1 stone's own video, in ordinary light, turning, and seen nothing, in which case the VS1 is the better buy. Every stone in our picker is IF to VS2 and every one has a video, so this is a five-minute check rather than a leap of faith.
Here is why the stricter advice costs so little in lab-grown. On October 5, 2026 the least expensive 2 carat emerald cut in our picker was $1,183 at VS2, $1,240 at VS1, $1,242 at VVS2, $1,259 at VVS1 and $1,756 at IF: the whole step from VS2 to VVS1 was $76, about six percent, on a stone whose entire point is that you can see into it. In mined diamonds the same step is a large share of the price, which is where the old advice to accept a VS2 emerald cut came from. Our VVS1 guide and VS clarity guide explain the grades; the thing to remember for this shape is that the report tells you how much is there and the video tells you whether it shows.
Color for an emerald cut
Color follows the same logic, more gently. A brilliant's mixed reflections blend a trace of warmth away; an emerald cut, with fewer and broader reflections, shows a trace of body color a little more readily, most of all at the ends and corners, and GIA notes that color appears more prominent in this cut for exactly that reason. Within our D to G range the rule is simple: up to about 2 carats a G emerald cut reads white in any metal; above 2 carats in white gold or platinum choose D to F; in yellow or rose gold the letter matters much less, because the metal warms every stone and a G in a yellow bezel looks whiter than a D in a platinum one. Our color scale guide goes through the letters and what each costs. For this shape the cost was small: on October 5, 2026 the least expensive 2 carat emerald cut was $1,183 at F, $1,230 at G, $1,236 at E and $1,324 at D, and at 3 carats $1,513 at G, $1,643 at D, $1,698 at F and $1,836 at E, so the day's stock decides the letter's price more than the letter does.
Length-to-width ratio: how long should an emerald cut be?
The ratio is the stone's length divided by its width, straight off the report's measurements, and for an emerald cut the classic range is 1.30 to 1.50: below 1.30 the stone reads squarish and starts to resemble an asscher, above 1.50 it reads long and slim. Our inventory sits almost entirely inside the classic range. On October 5, 2026 our picker listed 3,166 emerald cuts between 1 and 3 carats, D to G color and IF to VS2 clarity: 2,754 of them were between 1.30 and 1.50, 427 were 1.50 or longer, and three were shorter than 1.30. Square emerald cuts hardly exist in lab-grown, two in the whole feed at 1 carat and up, because a square step cut is cut as an asscher, which we do not stock. Among the 720 least expensive stones in that range the ratios, apart from two square stones, ran from 1.30 to 1.71 with a median of 1.44, and 555 of the 720 were in the 1.40s.
Three emerald cuts of the same face-up area, by ratio
1.30
Short and broad; 3 of 3,166 below it
1.45
The classic and the median; 2,754 of 3,166 at 1.30 to 1.50
1.60
Long and slim; 427 of 3,166 at 1.50 or over
Outlines drawn to the same area with the table marked, so the only thing that changes is how the stone spends it. Counts are emerald cuts of 1 to 3 carats in our picker on October 5, 2026.
What the number does on the hand: a 1.30 to 1.40 emerald cut is broad and calm, with a wide table that reads as a lot of stone and suits a bezel or a wide band; a 1.40 to 1.50 is the proportion most people picture, long enough to lengthen the finger without looking stretched; and 1.55 and up is a slim bar of light that flatters a long finger and a thin band, reads very modern east-west, and shows its clarity and color a little more at the ends. Length costs little in this shape: a 2.03 carat emerald cut at 1.55 was $1,242 on October 5, 2026 against $1,183 for the 1.41, while the short ones are dearer, partly because they are rarer: $1,498 for a 2.06 carat at 1.34, a D VVS2. Compare stones by their millimeters rather than their carats, since two 2 carat emerald cuts at 1.35 and 1.55 are visibly different rings. Two more things to check on the outline: the four cut corners should match, and the rows of facets should run parallel to the edges and meet at a centered table; symmetry graded Excellent or Very Good on the report covers most of this and the face-up photo covers the rest, since a step cut has nowhere to hide a crooked row.
The hall of mirrors: how an emerald cut handles light
An emerald cut does not sparkle, and the first thing to settle is whether you want it to. Brilliance, fire and scintillation all come from many small facets catching light at many angles; a step cut has few facets at few angles, so instead of a glitter it gives long, bright flashes that are larger than anything a brilliant produces, separated by dark planes that move as the hand moves. In daylight and under good lamps the effect is striking and the stone looks like a pool of clear water; in a dim restaurant it goes quiet while a round at the next table keeps flickering. There is no bow-tie, the shadow that crosses an oval or a marquise, because there is no brilliant pavilion to make one. What a step cut can show instead is a window, a see-through patch under the table in a stone cut too shallow, and its opposite, the black box, a stone cut so deep that the table reads dark from most angles. Depth is the number to watch on the report: the emerald cuts in our picker on October 5, 2026 ran from 59 to 72 percent with a median of 67, and tables from 55 to 73 with a median of 64. Stones below about 60 percent are the ones to check for a window, stones above about 70 for a dark table, and the way to check either is the video, turning the stone in ordinary light and watching whether the table stays bright. The report cannot tell you this; every stone in our picker has a video precisely so that you can.
How big an emerald cut looks: size by carat
An emerald cut carries more of its weight in the body of the stone than a brilliant does, so at the same carats it sits inside a slightly smaller outline: on October 5, 2026 the least expensive 2 carat emerald cut in our picker measured 8.3 by 5.9 mm, which is about 46 square millimeters of finger against the 52 of an 8.2 mm round, the 54 of a 9.1 by 6.3 mm radiant and the 57 of a 10.3 by 7.1 mm oval. Two things offset that on the hand. The length runs up the finger, where the eye reads size, so an 8.3 mm emerald cut reads longer than an 8.2 mm round; and the open table reads as more stone than a brilliant's busy face, which is why people who try both on often guess the emerald cut heavier than it is. The table gives the least expensive emerald cut at each weight in our picker that day, D to G color, IF to VS2 clarity, with its measurements and the price of the ring on our 14k solitaire; our carat size chart does the same for every shape and the size comparison simulator draws them on a hand.
| Carats | Emerald cut in our picker | Ratio | Price | With our 14k solitaire ($950) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0.5 | 0.55 ct, 5.7 x 3.9 mm | 1.47 | $352 | $1,302 |
| 1 | 1.00 ct, 6.7 x 4.8 mm | 1.39 | $640 | $1,590 |
| 1.5 | 1.51 ct, 7.8 x 5.3 mm | 1.49 | $793 | $1,743 |
| 2 | 2.02 ct, 8.3 x 5.9 mm | 1.41 | $1,183 | $2,133 |
| 2.5 | 2.53 ct, 9.1 x 6.4 mm | 1.43 | $1,512 | $2,462 |
| 3 | 3.09 ct, 10.5 x 6.6 mm | 1.59 | $1,513 | $2,463 |
| 4 | 4.02 ct, 10.9 x 7.4 mm | 1.48 | $2,082 | $3,032 |
| 5 | 5.07 ct, 12.2 x 7.7 mm | 1.58 | $2,376 | $3,326 |
| 7 | 7.03 ct, 13.6 x 8.7 mm | 1.56 | $3,618 | $4,568 |
| 10 | 10.15 ct, 15.2 x 9.9 mm | 1.53 | $4,933 | $5,883 |
Two rows are worth a second look: the 2.5 carat at $1,512 and the 3.09 carat at $1,513, a dollar apart on the day, which is the kind of gap that opens in lab-grown when a long stone (the 3.09 was cut to 1.59) sits in less demand than a classic one. Read the length column against something you know: a 2 carat emerald cut at 8.3 mm is a little under half the width of a dime, a 3 carat at 10.5 mm is well over half, and the 20 carat emerald cut that was the largest in the picker that day, at 18.7 by 12.2 mm and $18,247, is longer than a dime is wide. Supply is deep: 3,166 emerald cuts between 1 and 3 carats, 2,830 at 3 carats and up and 867 under 1 carat were listed that day.
Emerald cut vs radiant, oval, cushion, asscher and baguette
Here is every neighbor at 2 carats, the least expensive stone of each shape in our picker on October 5, 2026, D to G color, IF to VS2 clarity, with the measurements that decide how it looks on the hand.
| Shape, 2 ct | Size | From | Against the emerald cut |
|---|---|---|---|
| Emerald cut | 8.3 x 5.9 mm | $1,183 | The reference: the step cut, broad flashes, an open table that shows everything |
| Radiant | 9.1 x 6.3 mm | $1,096 | The same outline cut as a brilliant: glitter instead of planes, forgives a VS2 and a G, more face for the weight |
| Round | 8.2 mm across | $1,204 | The brightest cut; a tenth more face, no length, and nothing to hide an inclusion from either |
| Oval | 10.3 x 7.1 mm | $1,454 | Longer, softer and brighter, with a quarter more face and a bow-tie; a quarter more expensive that day |
| Elongated cushion | 8.5 x 6.6 mm | $1,216 | The soft rectangle: rounded corners, a brilliant's sparkle, a vintage feel, a little bigger for the weight |
| Asscher | about 7 x 7 mm | not stocked | The square step cut, with an X of facets meeting at the center; the emerald cut's shorter, squarer cousin |
| Baguette | side stones | with the setting | A small step cut with square corners and fewer rows, cut as a side stone; our tapered baguette setting flanks an emerald cut with two |
Emerald cut or radiant is the comparison most people are actually making, and it is about light: the emerald cut flashes in planes and shows its clarity, the radiant glitters and forgives, and the radiant vs emerald cut guide goes through it stone by stone, with the radiant guide covering that shape on its own. Emerald cut or oval is about temperament as much as outline, the calm rectangle against the bright ellipse; the oval guide covers the other side. Emerald cut or cushion is about edges and era, straight sides against curves, the elongated cushion guide has that one, and our cushion cut guide covers the cushion as a whole. Emerald cut or asscher is the step cut's own question, length against a square, and since we do not stock asschers the honest answer is that the rare square emerald cut, two in our picker at a carat and up that day, is as close as it comes. Our which shape looks biggest page ranks all of them by face-up area.
Settings for an emerald cut



The emerald cut is the one shape where the bezel comes first. A rim of metal follows the eight straight sides as if it were drawn for them, it protects the long girdle edges that are the one exposed part of the stone, it sits low, and it suits the cut's architectural character better than prongs do; on our site the bezel emerald cut is the ring people find us for more than any other, and our bezel guide covers the full, half and faux bezel in depth. The full bezel ($950) wraps the whole outline; the half bezel ($950) covers the two short ends and leaves the long sides open, which keeps the stone looking longer; the cathedral bezel ($1,000) lifts the rim on arches, and its yellow gold version is the most visited emerald cut ring on our site; the tulip bezel, low profile bezel ($1,300) and split cathedral bezel ($2,000) are variations on the theme, and the faux bezel ($2,300) draws the rim in metal while prongs do the holding.
Prongs show more of the stone. On our solitaire ($950) and cathedral ($1,000) heads the emerald cut is held by four prongs, one at each clipped corner, which leaves all four sides open and is the classic Art Deco presentation; the double claw ($1,100) splits each prong into a pair. The tulip designs ($1,000 to $1,350) replace the claws with petals that cup the stone from below, and the tulip emerald cut is the most clicked of our emerald sub-collections after the bezel. The hidden halo ($1,050) sets a ring of small diamonds into the gallery rail under the stone, where it shows from the side and braces the prongs without changing the outline from above, which adds the sparkle a step cut lacks without putting it where it would compete with the stone; a classic halo around an emerald cut tends to soften the corners that give it its character. East-west, with the stone set across the finger, suits the emerald cut as well as it suits any shape: the east-west half bezel ($950) and east-west cathedral ($1,000) turn a 1.45 stone into a bar of light that sits low and reads wide. Three stone designs are where the straight sides pay off, because the side stones can meet them flush: matching emerald cuts ($1,850), trapezoids ($1,350) or tapered baguettes ($2,200), all step cuts beside a step cut, and our three stone guide covers the side stone shapes, proportions and prices on their own. The low profile designs ($950 to $1,300) drop the whole head toward the finger. The table has every emerald cut design we make, with prices before the stone.
Setting prices in 14k, 18k and platinum from our catalog on October 5, 2026, before the diamond; every design also comes in 14k and 18k yellow, rose and two-tone gold. The emerald cut collection holds all 39, with sub-collections for bezels, solitaires, cathedrals, hidden halos, tulips, low profile, pavé bands, three stone, wide bands and engraved designs.
Emerald cut engagement rings with a wedding band
An emerald cut's straight sides and modest overhang make it one of the easiest shapes to pair. On the solitaire, the flat band and every bezel the head sits on a basket above the band, and a straight wedding band slides underneath and sits flush, which is one more point for the bezel, since a flush straight band beside a bezel-set emerald cut is the cleanest pairing there is. On the cathedral and hidden halo designs the arches or the rail rise to meet the stone, so a straight band usually leaves a small gap at the top unless it is curved or notched; on the low profile designs the stone sits at the band, so a straight band meets its overhang and a curved one closes the gap. An east-west emerald cut wants its band chosen with it. We make curved and notched bands to order to fit any of our settings, and our guide to matching a wedding band goes through the pairings.
What a lab-grown emerald cut costs
The table above gave the least expensive emerald cut at each weight; the pattern behind it is that the emerald cut is one of the best-priced shapes in lab-grown, as it is in mined diamonds, because a step cut loses less of the rough than a brilliant does. On October 5, 2026 it was the least expensive shape in our picker at 3 carats, $1,513 against the pear's $1,607, the round's $1,638, the cushion's $1,833, the oval's $1,870 and the radiant's $1,909, and second at 1 carat ($640, behind the pear's $571) and at 2 carats ($1,183, behind the radiant's $1,096). The grades the cut asks for cost little: VVS1 was $76 more than VS2 at 2 carats, and the four letters from D to G sat within $141 of each other. Length costs little and shortness costs more, as the ratio section showed. With the setting, a 14k solitaire or bezel with the 1 carat emerald cut is $1,590, with the 2 carat $2,133 and with the 3 carat $2,463; the lab-grown pricing guide explains the levers and the price calculator estimates any combination.
How to pick a good emerald cut
Six checks, all of which our picker lets you make from the report, the measurements and the video. First, clarity, which comes first in this shape and no other: VVS2 or better, or a VS1 whose video you have watched and found clean; and look at the plot on the report, since an inclusion at the edge is hidden by a bezel or a prong and one under the table is not. Second, color: G in gold or under 2 carats, D to F in white metal above that. Third, the ratio: 1.30 to 1.50 unless you want the slim 1.55 and up, and know that below 1.30 the choice is three stones. Fourth, the window and the dark table: depth between about 60 and 70 percent and a table around 60 to 68 keep the stone bright, and the video confirms it; the stones in our picker ran 59 to 72 percent depth with a median of 67 and tables of 55 to 73 with a median of 64. Fifth, the outline: four matching corners, parallel rows, a centered table, Excellent or Very Good symmetry on the report. Sixth, the measurements: compare your finalists by millimeters and ratio rather than by carat weight, then put them on a hand in the simulator. The 4Cs guide covers the grades behind the report.
Where Clairamor fits
Every emerald cut ring we make is a setting from the 39 above plus an emerald cut you choose from our picker, which listed 3,166 emerald cuts between 1 and 3 carats and 2,830 above 3 carats on October 5, 2026, every one lab-grown, D to G color, IF to VS2 clarity, with an IGI, GIA or HRD report, the measurements and ratio, a face-up photo and a video, which for this shape is the thing to watch before anything else. The setting price is the setting without the center stone, so the $950 bezel with the 2 carat emerald cut at $1,183 is a $2,133 ring. Every ring carries a lifetime warranty against manufacturing defects, comes with an appraisal for insurance, and includes one complimentary resize within 100 days for clients in the USA. An emerald cut has no points to worry about, but it still comes off for the gym, the garden and any work with tools or ropes.
Emerald cut engagement rings Choose an emerald cut diamond See it on a hand
Torn between a bezel and prongs, or between an emerald cut and a radiant? Book a design consultation.
Frequently asked questions
What is an emerald cut diamond?
A step-cut diamond with a rectangular outline and clipped corners, usually 57 long, parallel facets in rows around a wide open table. It flashes in broad planes rather than sparkling, the hall of mirrors, shows its clarity and color plainly, and has no points to chip. The cut was developed for emeralds and kept the name on diamonds.
Do emerald cut diamonds sparkle?
Not the way a brilliant does. A step cut has fewer facets at fewer angles, so instead of glitter it gives long, bright flashes separated by dark planes that move as the hand moves. In daylight the effect is striking and the stone looks like clear water; in dim light it goes quiet while a round keeps flickering.
What clarity should an emerald cut diamond be?
VVS2 or better is the safe choice, or a VS1 whose video you have watched and found clean; the open table hides nothing, so a VS2 inclusion under it can show. In lab-grown the stricter grade costs little: in Clairamor's picker on October 5, 2026 a 2 carat emerald cut was $1,183 at VS2 and $1,259 at VVS1.
What color is best for an emerald cut diamond?
D to F in white gold or platinum above about 2 carats, since a step cut shows a trace of warmth more readily than a brilliant; G reads white in yellow or rose gold at any size and in white metal under 2 carats. Every stone in Clairamor's picker is D to G, and the letters cost within $141 of each other at 2 carats.
What is the best length-to-width ratio for an emerald cut?
1.30 to 1.50, the classic range, with 1.40 to 1.50 the proportion most people picture; 1.55 and up reads slim and modern, and below 1.30 the stone looks squarish and is rare. Of 3,166 emerald cuts between 1 and 3 carats in Clairamor's picker on October 5, 2026, 2,754 sat between 1.30 and 1.50, median 1.44.
Are emerald cut diamonds cheaper than round?
Usually, because a step cut loses less rough. In Clairamor's picker on October 5, 2026 the least expensive 3 carat emerald cut was $1,513 against $1,638 for a round, and at 2 carats $1,183 against $1,204; at 1 carat $640 against $651. The grades an emerald cut needs add little in lab-grown.
How big is a 2 carat emerald cut diamond?
About 8.3 by 5.9 mm, a little under half the width of a dime; that was the least expensive 2 carat emerald cut in Clairamor's picker on October 5, 2026, at $1,183. It shows about a tenth less face than an 8.2 mm round of the same weight but reads longer, and its open table reads as more stone than a brilliant's busy face.
How much is a 3 carat emerald cut diamond ring?
In Clairamor's picker on October 5, 2026 a lab-grown 3 carat emerald cut of D to G color and IF to VS2 clarity started at $1,513, measuring 10.5 by 6.6 mm, the least expensive shape at that weight that day. With the 14k solitaire or bezel at $950 it makes a $2,463 ring; the settings run $950 to $2,400 in 14k gold.
Emerald cut vs radiant cut: which should I choose?
The emerald cut for clean lines, broad flashes and a stone you can see into, if you will buy the clarity it asks for; the radiant for the same outline with a brilliant's sparkle, which forgives a VS2 and a G. At 2 carats in Clairamor's picker on October 5, 2026 the emerald cut was $1,183 and the radiant $1,096.
What is the difference between an emerald cut and an asscher cut?
Both are step cuts with clipped corners; the emerald cut is a rectangle, usually 1.30 to 1.50 times as long as wide, and the asscher is square, its rows meeting in an X at the center, with a vintage, Art Deco character. Clairamor stocks the emerald cut and not the asscher; a rare square emerald cut is the closest its picker comes.
What setting is best for an emerald cut diamond?
A bezel, more than for any other shape: the rim follows the eight straight sides, protects the long girdle edges and suits the cut's architectural character, and the bezel emerald cut is the ring Clairamor's customers find it for most. Four prongs at the corners show more stone; a half bezel covers the ends; three stone designs with baguettes or trapezoids meet the sides flush.
Related reading
- Radiant cut vs emerald cut: sparkle, size, clarity, settings and prices compared
- Bezel engagement rings: full, half and faux bezel compared
- Three stone engagement rings: meaning, side stones, settings and prices
- Radiant cut engagement rings: ratios, sparkle, settings, sizes and prices
- Elongated engagement rings: oval vs emerald vs radiant vs marquise vs moval
- Oval engagement rings: ratios, the bow-tie, settings, sizes and prices
- Elongated cushion cut: the complete guide to ratios, sparkle, size and price
- Cushion cut engagement rings: square vs elongated, sparkle, settings, sizes and prices
- VVS1 diamond clarity: meaning, VVS1 vs VS1, and is it worth it?
- VS1 vs VS2 diamond clarity: what VS means, what you can see and what it costs
- Diamond color scale: D to Z chart, what you can see and what each grade costs
- What is a tulip setting? Prongs, basket and cathedral explained
- Hidden halo vs halo: which looks bigger and costs less?
- Diamond carat size chart: every shape at every weight
- Lab-grown diamond pricing guide